Pengaruh Kemiskinan terhadap Praktik Dinasti Politik di Indonesia dan Filipina Tahun 2017-2021

Main Article Content

Hikam Putra Pradikta

Abstract

This article aims to determine the influence between poverty and the expansion of political dynasties in the Philippines and Indonesia in 2017-2021. To provide comprehensive empirical, testing is carried out using multiple linear regression tests. The author uses multiple linear regression tests. The author uses three independent variables representing wealth through the variable Gross Domestic Product (GDP) Per Capita, welfare through the Human Development Index (HDI), and inequality through the Gini Ratio. As a result, the author finds empirical findings about the influence of poverty on political dynasties in both countries. In the Philippines, only wealth and prosperity can affect political dynasties. While in Indonesia, only wealth and prosperity can affect political dynasties. In general, poverty in both countries contributes to the expansion of political dynasties.
Keywords: poverty, political dynasty, multiple linear regression

Article Details

How to Cite
Pradikta, H. P. (2024). Pengaruh Kemiskinan terhadap Praktik Dinasti Politik di Indonesia dan Filipina Tahun 2017-2021. Global Focus, 4(02), 203–229. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jgf.2024.004.02.6

References

Agustino, L. (2014). Politik Lokal dan Otonomi Daerah. Bandung: Alfabeta.

ASEAN. (2020). ASEAN Key Figures 2020. ASEAN Statistics. Diakses September 14, 2022, dari https://www.aseanstats.org/wpcontent/uploads/2020/11/ASEAN_Key_Figures_2020.pdf

Aspinall, E., & Fealy, G. (2003). Local Power and Politics in Indonesia: Decentralization and Democratization. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Balisacan, A. M., & Fuwa, N. (2004). Going beyond cross-country averages: Growth, inequality and poverty reduction in the Philippines. World Development.

Constitutional Commission of 1986. (1986). 1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines. Official Gazette.

Cruz, C., Keefer, P., & Labonne, J. (2015). Incumbent advantage, voter information, and vote buying. Inter-American Development Bank.

Cruz, J. F., Mendoza, R. U., & Alungal, U. (2015). Do socio-economic conditions influence dynastic politics? Initial evidence from the 16th Lok Sabha of India. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Dahl, R. A. (2001). Perihal Demokrasi: Menjelajahi Teori dan Praktek Demokrasi Secara Singkat. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Dal Bó, E., Dal Bó, P., & Snyder, J. (2009). Political dynasties. Review of Economic Studies.

Lozada, D. (2016, April 14). #PHVote: The rise of ‘fat dynasties’. Rappler.com. Diakses pada Maret 14, 2023, dari https://www.rappler.com/moveph/129360-political-dynasties-economic-growth-bicol/

Feinstein, B. D. (2010). The dynasty advantage: Family ties in congressional elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly.

Fiva, J. H., & Smith, D. M. (2018). Political dynasties and the incumbency advantage in party-centered environments. American Political Science Review.

Geys, B., & Smith, D. M. (2017). Political dynasties in democracies: Causes, consequences and remaining puzzles. Economic Journal.

Gottfried, S. (2019). Contemporary Oligarchies in Developed Democracies. Palgrave Macmillan.

Guritno, D. C., Samudro, B. R., & Soesilo, A. M. (2019). The paradox of political dynasties of regeneration type and poverty in regional autonomy era. International Journal of Ethics and Systems.

Halim, A. (2014). Politik Lokal: Pola, Aktor dan Alur Dramatikalnya: Perspektif Teori Powercube, Modal dan Panggung. Yogyakarta: Lembaga Pengkajian Pembangunan Bangsa.

Harris, E. E. (1957). Political power. Ethics.

Robinson, J. A. (2001). When is a state predatory? Diakses pada Maret 15, 2023, dari https://wcfia.harvard.edu/files/wcfia/files/898_jr_predatory.pdf

Lim, T. C. (2010). Doing Comparative Politics: An Introduction to Approaches and Issues. Intelligence.

Mas’oed, M. (1990). Ilmu Hubungan Internasional Disiplin dan Metodologi. Jakarta: LP3ES.

Mendoza, R. U., Beja, E. L., Venida, V. S., & Yap, D. B. (2012). Inequality in democracy: Insights from an empirical analysis of political dynasties in the 15th Philippine Congress. Philippine Political Science Journal.

Mendoza, R. U., Beja, E. L., Venida, V. S., & Yap, D. B. (2013). Political dynasties and poverty: Resolving the ‘chicken or the egg’ question. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Mendoza, R. U., Lopez, A. O., & Banaag, M. (2019). Political dynasties, business, and poverty in the Philippines. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Mietzner, M. (2009). Indonesia’s 2009 elections: Populism, dynasties, and the consolidation of the party system. Lowy Institute for International Policy.

Munjin, A. (2018). Oligarki dan Demokrasi: Kajian Sumber Daya Kekuasaan Kiai dan Jawara di Banten. Cirebon: Nusa Litera Inspirasi.

United Nations. (n.d.). About HDRO. Human Development Reports.

Curato, N. (2012, Oktober 1). What is wrong with political dynasties? GMA News Online. Diakses pada September 12, 2022, dari https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/opinion/content/276345/what-is-wrong-with-political-dynasties/story/

O’Neil, P. H. (2017). Essentials of Comparative Politics (6th ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (1999). UU No. 22 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemerintah Daerah. Diakses pada Maret 1, 2021, dari https://www.dpr.go.id/dokjdih/document/uu/UU_1999_22.pdf

Querubin, P. (2016). Family and politics: Dynastic persistence in the Philippines. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 11(2), 151–181.

Querubin, P. (2011). Political reform and elite persistence: Term limits and political dynasties in the Philippines. Mimeo.

Robison, R., & Hadiz, V. R. (2005). Reorganising power in Indonesia: The politics of oligarchy in an age of markets. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies.

Schmitter, P. C., & Karl, T. L. (1991). What democracy is... and is not. Journal of Democracy.

Scruton, R. (2007). The Palgrave Macmillan Dictionary of Political Thought (3rd ed.). The Palgrave Macmillan Dictionary of Political Thought.

Sharp, A. M., Register, C. A., & Grimes, P. W. (1996). Economics of Social Issues. Irwin.

Sidel, J. T. (2004). Bossism and democracy in the Philippines, Thailand, and Indonesia. In Politicising Democracy: The New Local Politics and Democratisation.

Sujarwoto, S. (2015). Desentralisasi, dinasti politik dan kemiskinan di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik.

Tanzeh, A., & Arikunto, S. (2020). Metode Penelitian.

Worstall, T. (2014, Agustus 27). By global standards there are no American poor; All in the US are middle class or better. Forbes. Diakses pada September 21, 2022, dari https://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2014/08/27/by-global-standards-there-are-no-american-poor-all-in-the-us-are-middle-class-or-better/?sh=566b15af5cb5

Tusalem, R. F., & Pe-Aguirre, J. J. (2013). The effect of political dynasties on effective democratic governance: Evidence from the Philippines. Asian Politics and Policy.

Junaidi, V. (2018, Juni 26). Pilkada serentak: Bagaimana dampak politik dinasti dan apa perlu dihambat? BBC News Indonesia. Diakses pada September 12, 2022, dari https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-44597871

Winters, J. A. (2011). Oligarchy. Cambridge University Press.

Winters, J. A. (2013). Oligarchy and democracy in Indonesia. Indonesia.

CNN Indonesia. (2020, Desember 16). Dinasti politik di Pilkada 2020 disebut meningkat, 67 menang. Diakses pada Maret 9, 2021, dari https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20201216200833-32-583132/dinasti-politik-di-pilkada-2020-disebut-meningkat-67-menang

Kementrian Dalam Negeri. (2013, Oktober 22). Kemendagri: Dinasti politik semakin meluas. Diakses pada Maret 23, 2021, dari https://kemendagri.go.id/berita/baca/11872/kemendagri-dinasti-politik-semakin-meluas

World Bank. (2022, September 14). Measuring poverty overview. Diakses pada September 20, 2022, dari https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/measuringpoverty

ACAPS. (2023). Philippines Mindanao conflict. Diakses pada Maret 15, 2023, dari https://www.acaps.org